Showing posts with label Manuel V. Pangilinan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manuel V. Pangilinan. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Foreign agenda is bad cha-cha – labor group

NEWS RELEASE
10 June 2015

The House of Representatives (HOR) is on the verge of making the biggest historical mistake and disservice to the country today once its members vote for the removal of economic restrictions imposed upon foreign interests by the 1987 Constitution, the labor group Partido Manggagawa (PM) said in a statement.

Speaker Feliciano Belmonte, Jr. indicated lately that the HOR is going to pass his pet Resolution, the Resolution of Both Houses (RBH1), once absolute majority of the House membership are present in today’s session. 

PM Chair Renato Magtubo stated that, “Although the mode that is being smuggled for approval today is an untested formula for charter change, the push for it appears to be so powerful it is able to marshal the big quorum and solid vote of both the smart and shabby politicians in Congress.”

Magtubo said powerful interest groups were behind the big push for economic cha-cha as disclosed by no less than the Speaker of the House himself.

Belmonte admitted last year that the biggest lobby groups behind the economic cha-cha were the foreign chambers of commerce led by the American Chamber of Commerce, Australian New Zealand Chamber of Commerce, Canadian Chamber of Commerce, European Chamber of Commerce, Japanese Chamber of Commerce, Korean Chamber of Commerce, and the Philippine Association of Multinational Companies Regional Headquarters Inc.

Magtubo said: “The primary mandate of Congress is to uphold the full protection of the country’s sovereignty, patrimony and social justice which exclusively pertain to our natural and human resources. Hence, a cha-cha with foreign agenda is a bad cha-cha.”

Full freedom for foreign capital 

According to PM, Belmonte’s economic cha-cha carries the same old agenda of giving foreign capital full ownership freedom and flexibility in doing business in the country. 

RBH 1 seeks to further ease restrictions on foreign capital by amending specific provisions of the Constitution particularly Articles XII (National Economy and Patrimony), XIV (Education, Science and Technology, Arts, Culture and Sports) and XVI (General Provisions), by inserting the phrase “unless otherwise provided by law.”

This phrase, Magtubo said, “is comparable to an aircraft carrier loaded with all sorts of lethal weapons and with our Congress people assigned the new role of launching these warheads to annihilate the constitutional barriers for the complete rule of foreign capital in the country.”

The former partylist representative explained further that while the current provisions restricting foreign ownership of land, corporations and public utilities will remain in the Constitution, Congress, under the RBH1 insertion, can anytime pass a law removing these. 

100% ownership

PM said the country have had enough of free trade and investments with other countries and the global community since the Galleon trade – the free trade agreements with America, the IMF-WB/WTO regimes, and under the latest BOT and PPP programs, yet the country has remained in the state of underdevelopment.

The group believes that foreign capital wanted full control of their businesses in the country, including 100% ownership of land and corporations as they eye the country’s booming real estate business as well as the lucrative industries in power, water, infrastructure, telecommunications, transport, and even in education and healthcare. 

The group said a good exhibit to this foreign drive for cha-cha is the case of PLDT where ownership of a big chunk of its shareholdings were found to be under the control of an entity which is neither a registered corporation nor a citizen of the Philippine Republic, violating in effect the 60-40 rule Constitutional restrictions on foreign ownership.

Reports indicate that these shares are actually owned by the Indonesia-based Salim group whose entry into the country was facilitated by PLDT Chair Manuel Pangilinan known in the industry as MVP.

Perhaps MVP does not want a ‘foundling’ tag attached to PLDT’s alien shares,” added Magtubo.  And the same is true for other businesses where foreign interests are concealed under the skirt of local dummies.

No guarantee to foreign investment

The claims that economic cha-cha would mean more foreign investments in the country remains highly speculative as there are major factors that hinder their entry into the country, according to PM. 

“During the last decades, China, Vietnam and Thailand received the bigger chunks of FDIs than us despite their more restrictive policies on foreign ownership. Aliens cannot own land in China yet it gets the biggest FDI in Asia.  In other words, there are other bigger factors such as corruption, poor infrastructure and high power rates that discourage the entry of FDIs into the country,” said Magtubo.

He added that in terms of employment, for 40 years jobs, in the most liberalized EPZAs, which now include the BPOs, hardly reach 4% of total employment.  Meanwhile employment benefits in mostly foreign firms can never offset the social costs of destructive mining operations in the country.

“If these were the only gains we got from more than a century of dancing with foreign agenda, then perhaps the country, on the contrary, does not need more of them,” concluded Magtubo.


Thursday, May 21, 2015

Labor group challenges business sector to speak on Kentex tragedy

Press Release
May 21, 2015

The labor group Partido Manggagawa (PM) today challenged the business sector to speak on the fire at Kentex Manufacturing Corp. that killed at least 72 people, almost all of whom were factory workers and many of whom were women.

“Compared to the prominent role of employers in support of the controversial Bangsamoro Basic Law, they are noticeably absent in the calls for justice and reform in the wake of the tragic Kentex fire. Would Jaime Zobel de Ayala and Manny Pangilinan link up arms with labor leaders to call for jailing the immoral owners of Kentx and the criminalization of workplace safety violations?,” asserted Judy Ann Miranda, PM secretary general.

Yesterday, PM together with labor groups affiliated to the coalition Nagkaisa! trooped to the Kentex factory to hold a site inspection and spray paint the gutted factory and nearby establishment with the message “Sweatshop ito: NAKAMAMATAY!” The action was part of PM’s campaign to seek justice for the Kentex workers and demand labor reforms.

“Employer groups have been deafeningly silent on Kentex in contrast to their noisy opposition to wage hike demands. We dare them to denounce Kentex for its violations of workplace safety and labor standards. We call on them to support calls for criminalization of breach of occupational safety and health,” Miranda argued.

She noted that the recent statement by Employer Confederation of the Philippines that it does not condone labor law violations and it supports penalizing Kentex if found guilty is “too little, too late given the concrete facts that have been uncovered about the sweatshop conditions at the factory.”

PM is demanding that business groups spell out detailed mechanisms for self-regulation among it employer members to ensure compliance with labor rights and standards.


Miranda explained that “Even big companies and multinational corporations, which are generally compliant with the minimum standards set by law, benefit from sweatshop labor because small companies are subcontractors in their supply chains. For example, global garment brands even employ homeworkers toiling under the exploitative piece rate system not as direct employees but as laborers in layers upon layers of subcontracting arrangements. No wonder the business sector is quiet and absent in the outrage over Kentex since the capitalist class benefit as a whole from sweatshop labor.”

Friday, September 23, 2011

PALEA: Contractualization is unacceptable whether of MVP or LT’s type

Press Release
September 23, 2011
PALEA

In reaction to news reports on the possible acquisition by Manuel V. Pangilinan (MVP) of Philippine Airlines (PAL) from Lucio Tan (LT), the Philippine Airlines Employees’ Association (PALEA) stated that if his business model is also outsourcing and contractualization then it is unacceptable. “Contractualization is not ok whether of MVP or LT’s type,” asserted Gerry Rivera, PALEA president and vice chair of Partido ng Manggagawa.

Despite open denials from both the camps of Pangilinan and Tan, rumors persist of a buyout of PAL. Rivera added that “MVP is not a white knight but a black plague if his business model is more of the same contractualization. Furthermore PAL is not in need of a savior since it is a hugely profitable business with US$72.5 million in income for its 2010-2011 fiscal year.”

Rivera insisted that “The labor dispute can only be resolved if the present and any future owners of PAL maintain rather than destroy the job security of its workers. It is time for employers make a paradigm shift and craft business models that sustain regular jobs. Especially for the aviation industry, airline and passenger safety is ensured by regular employees not contractual workers whose work experience is no more than six months at a time and who are demoralized by low wages and bad working conditions.”

 “Outsourcing will not make PAL lean and mean, instead it will simply make Lucio Tan even richer. The same number of employees will still be working as a whole, only that many would then be in contractual agencies which pay less in wages and benefits. To cite examples, senior reservation agents of PAL who receive some PhP22,400 in salaries and allowances will just be paid PhP10,000 in the PLDT-owned service provider SPI Global and master technicians in airport services are being offered a measly PhP11,111.50 wage in Sky Logistics,” Rivera revealed.

With a week to go before the effectivity date of PAL’s outsourcing plan, PALEA asserts that a tiny minority of workers have accepted the separation offer and even less have signed up for work in the service providers. “We know that no more than 15% of the total 2,600 affected employees have claimed the separation package and even less than 7% have applied for jobs as contractuals in the providers,” Rivera announced.

He also contested that PAL would become more efficient if outsourcing is implemented. “It is myth that the departments to be outsourced are non-core services. No PAL plane can fly without the labor of employees in the airport services, in-flight catering and flight reservations. These departments are in fact profit centers that generate revenues for PAL. It is also a misconception that PAL is overmanned. If PAL employees do not regularly perform overtime then operations are disrupted and flights are delayed,” Rivera elaborated.